64-Year-Old Male with Hypertension and Comorbidity
February 14, 2024
58-Year-Old African American Female with Diabetes and Uncontrolled Hypertension
February 14, 2024

Personalized Treatment Regimen Following Pulse Wave Analysis

45-Year-Old Male with Uncontrolled Hypertension

Patient Medical History

  • 45-year-old male with diabetes and obesity
  • Current Rx regimen
    • Metformin 1 g twice daily
    • Perindopril 5 mg daily
    • Indapamide 1.25 mg daily

Initial Digital Vascular Biomarker Assessment

Brachial Blood Pressure 174/104 mmHg
Central Systolic Pressure 154 mmHg
Central Pulse Pressure Amplification 46%
Augmentation Index 20%

Initial Assessment Interpretation

The central pressure profile indicates a pulse pressure amplification of 46%. The central systolic pressure of 154 mmHg is more than the desired value of 124 mmHg. The Augmentation Index (AIx) is 20%.

Figure 10. Central Pressure Waveform

BBP indicates brachial blood pressure systolic/diastolic; CBP, central blood pressure systolic/diastolic; CPP, central pulse pressure; AIx, augmentation index; HR, heart rate; bpm, beats per minute.

Intervention

The first step is treatment for the elevated brachial blood pressure. Given the heart rate of 82 beats per minute, atenolol of 50 mg daily is prescribed.

Follow Up Digital Vascular Biomarker Assessment

Brachial Blood Pressure 158/86 mmHg
Central Systolic Pressure 147 mmHg
Central Pulse Pressure Amplification 20%
Augmentation Index 32%

Follow up Assessment Interpretation

The patient returns 3 weeks later taking atenolol, perindopril, and indapamide. The pulse waveform analysis is shown in Figure 11. Predictably (see Table 1), although the brachial blood pressure improved, the pulse pressure amplification fell from 46% to 20%. Improvement in the brachial pressure is attended by less desirable changes in the central pressure profile. The central systolic pressure of 147 mmHg continues to be more than the desired value of 124 mmHg. The AIx increased from 20% to 32%. Amlodipine is added to further reduce brachial pressure and to offset the changes in central pressure from atenolol treatment.

*Townsend RR et al. Journal of Clinical Hypertension. 2015; 17:7, 503–513.
http://bit.ly/2gc5mdD

Figure 11. Central Pressure Waveform

Intervention

Amlodipine is added to further reduce brachial pressure and to offset the changes in central pressure from atenolol treatment.

Final Digital Vascular Biomarker Assessment

Brachial Blood Pressure 136/84 mmHg
Central Systolic Pressure 124 mmHg
Central Pulse Pressure Amplification 33%
Augmentation Index 23%

Final Assessment Interpretation

After some time, the patient’s  brachial blood pressure shows improvement, while the central systolic pressure of 124 mmHg is near the desired value of 124 mmHg. The central pulse pressure amplification is 33%. The AIx fell from 32% to 23%. No further changes were made to this patient’s Rx medication regimen. This example shows the added value of central pressure measurements in a scenario where improvement in brachial pressure is not attended by a parallel improvement in central pressures.

*Townsend RR et al. Journal of Clinical Hypertension. 2015; 17:7, 503–513.
http://bit.ly/2gc5mdD

Table 1. General Effects of Antihypertensive Drugs on Central Pressures

CSP AIx
Angiotensin receptor blockers
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors
ß-Blockers
Calcium channel blockers
Diuretics
Organic nitrates

CSP indicates Central systolic pressure;  AIx, Augmentation Index

Figure 12. Central Pressure Waveform

Other Case Studies

72-Year-Old Male with Very Stiff Arteries and at High Risk
63-Year-Old Male with Hypertension and Low Augmentation Index
61-Year-Old Male with Hypertension and Comorbidities
33-Year-Old Male with Persistent Systolic Hypertension*
41-Year-Old Male with Untreated Hypertension
64-Year-Old Male with Hypertension and Comorbidity
45-Year-Old Male with Uncontrolled Hypertension
58-Year-Old African American Female with Diabetes and Uncontrolled Hypertension
70-Year-Old Female with Chronic Kidney Disease and Hypertension